So I organize an Angel Tree here at the newspaper every year at Christmastime. I get 80-some names of kids (babies to teens) from Community Shelter Services. I write out Angel Tree tags with their first name, age and a few gift suggestions and then I hound my co-workers into adopting an angel (or two or three).
In past years, their generosity has been simply overwhelming. Bags and bags of presents, bicycles...you name it...so many gifts I couldn't fit them all in one conference room.
This year, not so much.
The truck comes tomorrow to pick up the gifts and there are still 25 angels hanging on the wall in the lunchroom. I've been feeling pretty downhearted about it and, frankly, a little disappointed in my co-workers who are paid better than most. I know, however, that money is tighter for most middle-class families -- mine included. Everything is going up -- YMCA memberships, gasoline, natural gas, garbage pickup ... leaving little in the family budget for generosity.
Just now, a woman from the newspaper's outside accounting firm came into my office, introduced herself and wondered if she could have the weekend to shop because she and her husband would really like to take the rest of the names that are left. All 25 of them.
My Christmas spirit is now officially restored.


Comments (3)
Heather, I think you're being a little too hard on your co-workers. Christmas presents were being collected for kids this year from a number of local sources, i.e. Millcreek Township and Toys for Tots, and you can't tell if they got the gifts instead of your gift tree. Besides, by your reckoning, about 60 kids got presents from Times Publishing Company staffers. That's pretty good.
Also worth noting is that some of the unclaimed angels were for pretty expensive gifts, like a Nintendo DS and an MP3 player. I'm not saying that the presents have to come from the dollar store, but a $130 video-game console? Come on.
Posted by Gary Kirchherr | December 17, 2007 4:56 PM
Posted on December 17, 2007 16:56
Blogs are pure opinion and the beauty of it is that if you don't agree with it, you're invited to say so.
Posted by Heather | December 19, 2007 11:36 AM
Posted on December 19, 2007 11:36
I don't think Heather owes anyone an apology. She stated her opinion and you disagreed. That's the wonderful world of blogging! Its as simple as that. You, who work for the paper, should know that the editorials in the paper probably offend at least one person everyday. Perhaps you owe the general public a daily apology for the editorial opinions that your paper writes.
Posted by Anonymous | December 19, 2007 2:19 PM
Posted on December 19, 2007 14:19