Q: How far has this franchise come along in comparison to what you expected?
A: When I look at it, I thought we waited too long to rebuild. Now that we have, I think that we can put a team on the ice that will be extremely competitive. We can’t afford to be as young as we have been in the past. That really showed (the last two seasons) when (other teams) put their top 19 and 20 year-olds on the ice. But at the same time, we’ve got a number of young players that have got to take a step up now because they got so much ice time.
Q: Can this team not just compete for a playoff spot this year but make a run?
A: I think that if we do the right things, I call it playing with the big boys. But we have some things to do. We have some T’s to cross. We have to do what we can. We don’t know if we can do it losing (defenseman Mitch) Gaulton. You just don’t snap your fingers on that.
Q: What does this team have to do this year to be able to play with the big boys? What are some of those I’s that have dotted and T’s that have to be crossed?
A: We’ve got to learn to win, and we’ve got to learn to believe that we can compete with them.
Q: How does that happen?
A: By developing a work ethic and developing a few wins at a time here, and winning key games, important games.
Q: Is there any concern that the losses of the past couple of years during the rebuilding effort has sent this team a few steps back in that process of learning how to win?
A: Yeah, there’s concern for me. Because we haven’t (won). But what I really like about it is that (coach) Robbie (Ftorek) knows how to teach kids to be competitive. He knows how to get them to compete. The other factor is that they have to believe in each other.
Q: Do you see that so far in this group?
A: I like a lot of kids that are doing that, in talking to them. I feel like they want to win for each other, you know.
Q: Teams like Windsor rebuilt quicker than the Otters have. Why haven’t there been as many positive results in the standings?
A: First of all, they had a couple of key players in the draft (Taylor Hall and Ryan Ellis) that turned out to be outstanding players, which I give them credit for. They never suffered the injuries (the Otters did). I’m not making that as an excuse. I think that if we’d had (defenseman) Josh Kidd and Gaulton all year, the only time we had them healthy and in the lineup was when we beat Kitchener.
Q: Do you think those factors are the main reasons why the rebuilding effort hasn’t gone as well, or are there other reasons?
A: I don’t think that we had the right chemistry. I think that Robbie’s done a real good job in developing responsibility and developing leadership. It’s not totally there. As guys like (center Ryan) O’Reilly get older …
Q: Why wasn’t the right chemistry there before Robbie came along?
A: It just wasn’t. I don’t know why. It could have been a number of reasons. I don’t know why it wasn’t. But I didn’t feel it. I think now that we’ve put a couple of guys up on the trading block (forwards Nick Palmieri and Jordan Skellett) right off the bat, the team understands – we didn’t do it for that reason – but hey you can’t be happy here, the only way you’re going to play here is to learn to be happy.
Q: Do you feel that group has the makings of that chemistry?
A: I really do, yeah.
Q: Why do you think that is?
A: Well because some of the younger guys when they get older – I saw (center Zack) Torquato and (left wing Luke) Gazdic and even (forward Justin) Hodgman over this camp give some outstanding leadership. I thought this is the best leadership I’ve seen in a long time. Making the team responsible, making each other responsible. Those are the kind of little things. It’s not just your on-ice abilities.
Q: You mentioned earlier that you waited too long to start the rebuilding process? Are you referring to the deal involving Bret Nasby and Adam Berti (in November 2005)?
A: I don’t know if there were any reasons. I think when I look back and analyze, the same reason you do an autopsy on a body, I should have done it a year earlier.
Q: Are you referring to the deal involving Bret Nasby and Adam Berti?
A: Yeah, exactly.
Q: Do you think that was where the turning point in a negative way occurred, when that trade was made? And has this team not fully overcome that turning point?
A: When I analyze my actions in the past, I want this stated too – it’s no reflection on the players, on their abilities – it was a dumb, dumb move on my part.
Q: Why was it a dumb move on your part?
A: I should have done the opposite. The next year I said we’re going to strip the team down. I had the assets to do it right there (instead of acquire Nasby and Berti). Administratively, it was a bad decision by management.
Q: How would you assess your decisions since that point?
A: I don’t know. I think I’ve made some pretty good deals – (former center Ryan) O’Marra and all those guys. I see now what it takes. Some of these guys rebuild in a hurry. Do you rebuild just to make the playoffs? I see a nucleus of players here that I think once Robbie gets them winning they’re going to win for a long time.
Q: How far away do you think they are from that point?
A: I’ll tell you after 10 games. I’ll tell you after who returns from the NHL.
Q: When you look at several drafts in the past several years, you don’t have that first-round pick, that second-round pick. Anthony Peluso was one, Jordan Nolan, Brett MacLean. Has scouting been a factor in not getting this franchise back up to where you envision it being?
A: I think we could have done a better job. I think that’s a good point. I think that’s a safe comment. When we look at it, could we have drafted better? I’m more upset about giving up quality people like (former defenseman Eric) Regan.
Q: Why haven’t your drafts overall, especially your top, say, three picks, fared as well as when Frank Jay was running the operation? Why haven’t those players have had the great impact as, say, Brad Boyes and Carlo Colaiacovo?
A: Brad Boyes are special guys. I mean that’s out of one draft. When you look back, you’ll see other guys that didn’t pan out. You get the O’Reillys and the Boyes; they only come around once in a while.
Q: How would you grade the overall drafts in the past several years, especially during the time when you’ve tried to rebuild?
A: I’d have to go through that. That’s a good question. I’d have to think about that. I’d love to talk about that actually, because I have no problem self-analyzing.
Q: How much longer do you foresee yourself being in the top spot of the organization?
A: Oh, I don’t know. I haven’t even thought about that yet. I haven’t thought about that.
Q: How stable is the future of this club in the city of Erie?
A: I think it’s pretty stable. But if – who’s the guy from the computer company down there that just gave $35 billion – he comes along and offers me a billion dollars for the team to move it to Alaska so (Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah) Palin’s kids can play, I don’t want you to think we might not do it.
Q: Do you feel that you’re able to do it for several years more?
A: I can’t you tell you that. At one time I did (look at retirement). I think if we’re not doing the job, it’s just self-analyze it.