« Home for the Holidays | Main | Yes Kids There Is »

Conspiracy of Silence

The Mitchell Report critical of the misuse of steroids and human growth hormones throughout pro baseball spends a lot of time naming names, and in our celebrity driven world the question of who’s who on the list is taking a lot of the media attention.

I certainly don’t hold those players blameless for their actions, but c’mon.

This goes a lot deeper than that.

Let’s go back for a moment to August 12th, 1994.

Major League players had just walked off the job, which led to the cancellation of the first post season by any major American sport due to labor issues.

The owners, citing dwindling finances and a growing disparity between the haves and the have-nots, pushed for a salary cap that the union would not accept.

The strike lasted 234 days, until April of the next year when a federal ruling went against the owners and the players returned under the conditions of the old agreement.

But fans were leaving in droves, tired of the greed they saw on both sides from whiny millionaires unable to split more money than the fans would ever see in their lives.

The game was back but the interest was waning.

Something had to happen to save the sport.

And something did, in the form of a majestic home run boom that saw forty year old records fly away as easily as a mid-80’s fastball in the hands of a new breed of muscled warriors with names like Sosa, and McGuire and suddenly, Bonds.

Even pitchers whose numbers had started to slip found new life late in their careers, the Pettittes and Clemens whose late rebounds were credited to drive and off-field conditioning.

Am I saying that there was some overt, direct plan from ownership to get players to “juice up” to save the sport?

Of course not.

It smells a lot more like a conspiracy of silence, a wink-and-nod, don’t ask-don’t tell atmosphere that benefited the suits as well as the individual players’ career length.

It seems awlfully hard to believe that executives who have given their professional lives to understanding and studying a sport and the people who play it could be that blind to something that widespread.

Impossible, in fact.

There will be a lot of gnashing of teeth in the weeks to come and calls to cross out milestones and kick alleged offenders out of the Hall.

But for my two cents there is a lot of blame to go around in baseball, from the dugout straight up to the owner’s box, and you have to wonder if the needle fix for the sport in the 90’s could come back to do more harm than good to the game in the long run.

Comments (1)

Dale:

Scott, I'm not a baseball fan, period. However I don't really understand the flap over the use of HGH and steroids. Certainly a bigger body can hit a ball harder or throw harder, but does the drug improve eyesight or timing needed to hit a 3 inch ball coming at
90 miles per hour? Or to throw that fast and still nick the corner of the plate? I find it hard to believe. Does anyone believe that if steroids had been available years ago that players wouldn't have tried them? Babe Ruth was an alcoholic.
That said, I agree that if MLB had been honest, they could have instituted mandatory testing a long time ago. Every player, often enough to uncover usage, and immediate suspension for failing the test. No more problem.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Please enter the security code you see here

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 18, 2007 9:54 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Home for the Holidays.

The next post in this blog is Yes Kids There Is.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35